The aggregate above is the sum of fourteen parameter evaluations, each scored between 0 and 98 against the Byon Labs methodology. Every parameter is accompanied by a motivating note grounded in publicly available documentary evidence.
Mural practice documented from c. 2017, approximately 8–9 years of mural-specific continuity. Prior gallery practice does not enter this parameter.
Very high production volume of large-scale Caravaggesque mural reproductions.
Use of video projection openly declared by the artist as constitutive of the practice (the Recupero del Classico methodology). The parameter records this at the low end of the scale. A score of zero would not be accurate: brushwork, colour mixing, scale and surface adaptation remain manual. However, the foundational act of composition is not original to the execution.
Documented permanent murals across Europe and the Americas.
Multiple institutional commissions; collaboration with museums on contextual programmes.
Substantial press coverage in Italy and internationally; some critical scholarship.
Gallery presence; museum and biennial standing limited.
No significant documented archival evidence of writing or non-commissioned practice antecedent to the contemporary mural career.
The visual language is, by methodology, that of Caravaggio reproduced; distinctiveness lies in the choice of programme rather than in autonomous visual grammar.
Open Air Classical Museum programme is coherent and sustained.
Urban regeneration projects with documented institutional recognition.
Recognition from cultural institutions strong; recognition from the contemporary muralism peer field is divided.
Practice concentrated on the single methodology of classical-reproduction murals.
The systematic open-air reproduction of classical paintings at mural scale is a distinctive position whose innovation rests primarily on programme rather than on formal grammar.